H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 0-1
Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2002 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |