H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1

Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 US Open round of 128 6-1 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justin Gimelstob #87 6-1 6-3 6-2 Andrea Gaudenzi #92 Match data Sep 1, 1999* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.