H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1
Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1999 US Open first round 6-1 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-1 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |