H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Lionel Roux H2H: 2-2
Andrea Gaudenzi and Lionel Roux are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lionel Roux leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1997 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1997* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-1 6-2 | Lionel Roux | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1996* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lionel Roux | 6-2 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1996* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lionel Roux | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1995* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-0 6-4 | Lionel Roux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lionel Roux | #975 | #48 | 808 | 1,726 | 76 | 116 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Lionel Roux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #101 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #255 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #559 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |