H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Maurice Ruah H2H: 0-1

Maurice Ruah holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maurice Ruah leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maurice Ruah won the 1994 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maurice Ruah
VEN Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maurice Ruah #103 6-4 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #31 Match data Jun 16, 1994* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Maurice Ruah #1,345 #90 479 1,578 20 38 34.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Maurice Ruah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #455 1,488 0 0
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 1990 2–1 66.7% #203 1,521 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 1991 2–5 28.6% #272 1,501 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 1992 1–1 50.0% #162 1,519 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #135 1,511 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 1994 12–24 33.3% #157 1,471 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #440 1,464 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #223 1,454 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #251 1,448 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 1998 2–1 66.7% #177 1,482 0 0
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Maurice Ruah
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 14 22 36 38.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 50/54 of Maurice Ruah's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Maurice Ruah
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% 1991 7/7 3.9 4.7 59.4% 66.1% 49.6% 60.9% 49.2% 59.1% 38.1%
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% 1992 2/2 2.0 1.5 57.3% 58.6% 54.7% 45.0% 42.2% 57.0% 39.2%
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% 1993 3/3 3.0 4.3 54.6% 73.0% 42.6% 50.6% 30.6% 59.0% 36.8%
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% 1994 32/36 2.6 2.5 56.1% 65.5% 47.8% 49.1% 37.6% 57.6% 35.8%
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% 1995 1/1 1.0 1.0 58.6% 61.8% 41.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 35.0%
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 1996 1/1 1.0 1.0 64.7% 45.5% 44.4% 58.3% 20.0% 45.1% 38.3%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 1997 1/1 6.0 2.0 53.8% 65.3% 45.2% 73.3% 100.0% 56.0% 36.0%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 1998 3/3 5.0 2.0 61.1% 68.9% 49.1% 67.3% 28.8% 61.5% 38.7%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 50/58 2.9 2.8 57.0% 65.5% 47.9% 52.5% 39.6% 57.7% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Maurice Ruah
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1488 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.09
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 1990 1521 107.2 — — — — +37 — — 66.7% +0.83 — 1–1 — +0.17
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 1991 1501 105.1 -0.55 +0.28 0.932 49.3% +35 — — 40.0% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.28
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 1992 1519 109.5 -2.16 +0.10 0.911 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — -0.16
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1993 1511 97.5 -3.66 -0.12 0.899 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–0 — +0.12
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 1994 1471 109.6 -3.17 -2.30 0.844 46.4% +20 +56 +43 35.2% -1.05 4–6 (40%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +2.78
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 1995 1465 102.0 -0.78 -0.85 0.752 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.12
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 1996 1455 95.4 -2.32 -3.28 0.698 41.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.07
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 1997 1449 102.9 +0.85 -1.35 0.819 47.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 1998 1482 108.1 -0.34 -0.29 1.004 51.3% +36 — — 50.0% +0.75 2–0 0–1 — +0.29
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1578 109.9 -2.48 -1.56 0.865 47.1% +25 +56 +43 36.9% -0.93 7–10 (41%) 9–8 (53%) 103.1 +5.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.