H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Michal Tabara H2H: 1-1
Andrea Gaudenzi and Michal Tabara are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay, while Michal Tabara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Tabara won the 2001 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michal Tabara | 3-6 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2000* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-3 6-0 | Michal Tabara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michal Tabara | #1,290 | #47 | 773 | 1,686 | 39 | 52 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Michal Tabara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #123 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #64 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #210 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |