H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 0-1
Paradorn Srichaphan holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paradorn Srichaphan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2002 Washington second round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |