H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 1-0

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 Estoril Open semifinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Paul Haarhuis
NED Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #36 6-2 6-1 Paul Haarhuis #26 Match data Apr 13, 1996* SF Estoril Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Paul Haarhuis #623 #18 1,341 1,887 251 247 50.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Paul Haarhuis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #462 1,488 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 1989 9–7 56.2% #57 1,635 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 1990 20–25 44.4% #54 1,670 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 1991 25–25 50.0% #37 1,729 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 1992 33–29 53.2% #39 1,684 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 1993 30–26 53.6% #42 1,764 0 0
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 1994 26–22 54.2% #37 1,715 0 0
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 1995 33–24 57.9% #19 1,715 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 30–28 51.7% #25 1,735 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 19–25 43.2% #70 1,674 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 20–20 50.0% #74 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–15 28.6% #178 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Paul Haarhuis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 14 11 25 56.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 20 12 32 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 13 8 21 61.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 13 26 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 7 11 18 38.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 111 98 209 53.1% 56 70 126 44.4% 28 25 53 52.8% 56 54 110 50.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Paul Haarhuis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 1991 44/50 3.8 2.3 58.4% 68.3% 52.1% 45.9% 48.3% 61.5% 40.2%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 1992 55/62 4.0 1.9 59.8% 70.2% 51.8% 63.1% 41.7% 62.7% 38.0%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 1993 51/56 4.0 2.0 59.5% 69.2% 52.2% 60.9% 43.4% 62.2% 38.2%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 1994 43/48 4.2 2.0 59.7% 68.8% 50.0% 64.0% 48.8% 61.1% 37.1%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% 1995 55/57 4.6 2.6 59.8% 68.3% 50.7% 54.3% 40.4% 61.0% 36.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 48/58 4.2 1.8 62.5% 68.2% 51.8% 50.8% 44.9% 62.2% 35.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 37/44 5.3 2.8 59.7% 71.9% 51.2% 59.4% 46.1% 63.5% 37.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/40 5.8 3.2 56.4% 71.4% 50.5% 60.7% 45.0% 62.5% 36.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 17/21 5.3 2.4 61.5% 68.9% 48.6% 61.8% 29.9% 61.0% 36.2%
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 380/498 4.4 2.3 59.7% 69.4% 51.2% 57.5% 43.9% 62.0% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Paul Haarhuis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1988 1489 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 1989 1636 132.2 — — — — -19 -43 — 54.3% +0.30 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.8 +0.52
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 1990 1670 140.9 — — — — -4 -37 -64 46.9% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 100.3 -1.33
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 1991 1730 144.8 +0.85 +1.66 1.042 50.8% +15 -61 -171 51.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -2.69
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 1992 1685 143.9 +1.01 +0.37 1.019 50.2% +33 -24 — 50.3% +0.07 9–8 (53%) 12–15 (44%) 99.9 -0.46
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 1993 1764 141.2 +1.06 +0.08 1.010 50.5% -19 +4 -232 53.5% +0.17 8–9 (47%) 11–11 (50%) 102.1 -0.40
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 1994 1715 147.9 +0.13 -0.29 0.953 49.4% +46 +62 — 50.8% -0.08 10–4 (71%) 8–9 (47%) 104.6 -1.32
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 1995 1716 137.5 -0.59 -0.36 0.931 48.7% +46 -19 -93 50.0% -0.17 18–5 (78%) 11–12 (48%) 106.7 +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1736 139.0 +0.20 -0.84 0.946 49.0% +10 -47 -15 46.6% -0.19 12–5 (71%) 13–16 (45%) 105.2 +0.88
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1675 138.9 +1.41 -0.41 1.025 50.4% -16 -7 +99 48.7% +0.13 5–13 (28%) 14–12 (54%) 93.4 -0.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1660 132.7 +0.38 -1.61 0.960 49.6% +19 -37 +79 48.4% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 103.3 +1.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1620 127.7 -0.68 -0.73 0.928 48.6% +35 -73 +103 42.4% -0.44 0–6 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 89.4 -1.04
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1888 146.0 +0.48 -0.13 0.982 49.8% +17 -22 -15 49.4% 0.00 84–71 (54%) 97–108 (47%) 102.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.