H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-0
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1994 Stockholm Masters third round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1994* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |