H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Roberto Carretero H2H: 1-0
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Carretero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 Estoril fourth round 4-6 7-6(7) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1996* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 4-6 7-6(7) 7-5 | Roberto Carretero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Roberto Carretero | #1,129 | #58 | 781 | 1,709 | 23 | 45 | 33.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrea Gaudenzi | Roberto Carretero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #366 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #258 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #306 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #354 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #428 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |