H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-1
Andrea Gaudenzi and Thomas Johansson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2001 US Open second round 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 4-6 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| May 12, 1999* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |