H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andreas Maurer vs Mel Purcell H2H: 0-2
Mel Purcell holds a 2–0 lead over Andreas Maurer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mel Purcell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mel Purcell won the 1983 Wimbledon third round 5-7 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Mel Purcell | 5-7 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
| May 27, 1981* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mel Purcell | 3-6 4-6 6-1 6-3 6-1 | Andreas Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Maurer | #1,008 | #24 | 12 | 1,821 | 114 | 138 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Maurer | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1981 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #49 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1982 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #65 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1985 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1986 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #384 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |