H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-5

Ernests Gulbis holds a 5–1 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-5 6-4.

ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 5
6 main draw meetings
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Ernests Gulbis #80 6-3 7-5 6-4 Andreas Seppi #38 Match data
Oct 18, 2014* Moscow ATP 250 QF Hard Ernests Gulbis #13 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(3) Andreas Seppi #49 Match data
Mar 12, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ernests Gulbis #67 5-7 6-3 6-4 Andreas Seppi #20 Match data
Jan 7, 2010* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Ernests Gulbis #90 6-4 7-5 Andreas Seppi #49 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Ernests Gulbis #51 6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 Andreas Seppi #31 Match data
May 21, 2008* Poertschach ATP 250 R32 Clay Andreas Seppi #32 1-6 6-4 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3