H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 0-1

Evgeny Korolev holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Seppi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeny Korolev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evgeny Korolev won the 2006 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 2-6 3-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Evgeny Korolev
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evgeny Korolev #151 6-4 2-6 3-6 7-5 6-1 Andreas Seppi #69 Match data May 31, 2006* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Evgeny Korolev #1,762 #46 1,012 1,793 72 92 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Evgeny Korolev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 8–8 50.0% #103 1,614 0 0
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0 2007 20–24 45.5% #80 1,680 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0 2008 13–17 43.3% #106 1,679 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0 2009 17–17 50.0% #53 1,729 0 0
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2010 12–20 37.5% #140 1,666 0 0
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0 2012 1–3 25.0% #211 1,624 0 0
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #329 1,608 0 0
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andreas Seppi Evgeny Korolev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 15 29 48.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 10 10 20 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 47 47 94 50.0% 22 32 54 40.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's and 164/164 of Evgeny Korolev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andreas Seppi Evgeny Korolev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/16 5.1 4.6 58.5% 73.4% 48.5% 66.9% 41.2% 62.9% 37.2%
19 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3% 2007 44/44 5.0 3.3 57.4% 67.7% 45.9% 53.6% 42.4% 58.7% 35.1%
20 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1% 2008 30/30 4.4 4.2 58.7% 69.1% 45.1% 61.9% 33.7% 59.6% 36.4%
21 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2% 2009 34/34 5.8 2.5 60.4% 73.3% 49.8% 47.8% 48.0% 63.7% 36.5%
22 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9% 2010 32/32 4.6 3.9 55.5% 68.6% 46.2% 53.1% 44.2% 58.9% 37.8%
23 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8% 2012 4/4 4.3 3.5 57.7% 68.0% 44.5% 42.1% 24.2% 58.0% 38.0%
25 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6% 2013 4/4 2.0 4.0 54.7% 65.6% 43.7% 27.1% 11.5% 54.5% 22.0%
26 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5% — 164/164 4.9 3.6 58.0% 69.8% 46.8% 54.2% 41.0% 60.2% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andreas Seppi Evgeny Korolev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1614 127.8 +0.28 +0.04 1.003 50.4% -58 +39 — 51.1% +0.02 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.32
19 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12 2007 1681 129.7 -3.44 -1.27 0.850 47.3% +4 -32 -173 43.3% -0.66 10–5 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -2.17
20 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.78 2008 1679 123.9 -2.52 +0.94 0.901 48.4% -19 -14 — 43.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.64
21 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.12 2009 1730 138.6 +0.09 +0.28 1.007 50.2% +46 -47 -263 51.2% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–5 (71%) — +1.26
22 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.63 2010 1666 132.3 -3.23 +1.40 0.920 48.5% +87 -105 -198 45.3% -0.31 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.58
23 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.24 2011 1548 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) — -1.47 2012 1624 120.7 -1.32 -0.40 0.906 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.19
25 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) — -2.26 2013 1609 109.9 -3.36 -2.25 0.485 39.9% — +47 — 33.3% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.32
26 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.33 2014 1566 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.68 2015 1561 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00 — 1794 131.2 -2.08 +0.10 0.908 48.5% +24 -23 -210 45.9% -0.39 26–26 (50%) 35–31 (53%) 103.7 -2.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.