H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 6-1

Andreas Seppi holds a 6–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2018 Monte Carlo Masters third round 4-6 6-3 7-5.

ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andreas Seppi #62 4-6 6-3 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 Match data
Jun 29, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Andreas Seppi #45 6-2 6-4 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #58 Match data
Feb 8, 2015* Zagreb ATP 250 F Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #33 7-6(4) 6-3 Andreas Seppi #40 Match data
Jan 5, 2012* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Andreas Seppi #38 7-5 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #65 Match data
May 27, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Andreas Seppi #56 6-3 6-3 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #50 Match data
Mar 27, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Andreas Seppi #39 7-6(6) 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #76 Match data
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Andreas Seppi #31 6-2 4-6 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data
Apr 15, 2007 Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Clay Andreas Seppi #91 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3