H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0

Andreas Seppi holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2008 US Open first round 6-3 7-5 3-6 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andreas Seppi #31 6-3 7-5 3-6 3-6 6-3 Hyung-Taik Lee #101 Match data Aug 27, 2008* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andreas Seppi Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andreas Seppi Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6% 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6% 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
34 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andreas Seppi Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.78 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.24 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) — -1.47 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) — -2.26 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.31
26 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.33 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.15
27 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.68 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) — -1.24
28 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.77 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.09
29 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.56 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.85
30 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.46 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.52
31 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.89
32 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.56 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.14
33 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.16 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
34 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.