H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-1

Andreas Seppi and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass, while Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2011 Wimbledon second round 6-4 7-6(4) 7-5.

ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #30 6-4 7-6(4) 7-5 Andreas Seppi #38 Match data
Oct 10, 2007* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Andreas Seppi #73 6-2 6-2 Marcos Baghdatis #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3