H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andreas Seppi vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-1
Andreas Seppi and Sergiy Stakhovsky are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay, while Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2014 US Open first round 6-3 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-3 6-1 6-4 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| May 20, 2010* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-5 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andreas Seppi | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |