H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-1

Andreas Seppi and Steve Darcis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2017 Sofia round of 16 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #59 6-3 7-5 Andreas Seppi #75 Match data Feb 10, 2017* R16 Sofia ATP 250 Hard
Andreas Seppi #89 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) 7-6(2) Steve Darcis #71 Match data Jan 22, 2017* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2
28 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2
30 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2
32 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3 — — — — — — —
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andreas Seppi Steve Darcis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's and 209/218 of Steve Darcis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andreas Seppi Steve Darcis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5%
23 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2% 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9%
24 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8% 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
25 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6% 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1%
26 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8% 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6%
27 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8% 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3%
28 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8% 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1%
29 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5% 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5%
30 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3% 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9%
31 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2% 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3%
32 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6% 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9%
33 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6% 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9%
34 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1% 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7%
36 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5% — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andreas Seppi Steve Darcis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.12 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.63 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
23 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.24 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67
24 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) — -1.47 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16
25 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) — -2.26 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42
26 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.33 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11
27 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.68 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14
28 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.77 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70
29 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.56 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52
30 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.46 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
31 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13
32 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.56 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
33 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.16 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06
34 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.18 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76
36 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.62 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00 — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.