H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Andreas Seppi vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 2-2

Andreas Seppi and Vasek Pospisil are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vasek Pospisil leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2016 Rome Masters second round 7-6(5) 7-6(2).

ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
CAN Age 36 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2022* US Open Grand Slam Q2 Q Hard Andreas Seppi #196 3-6 6-2 7-5 Vasek Pospisil #130 Match data
Sep 30, 2019 Beijing ATP 500 Q1 Q Hard Vasek Pospisil #245 6-3 6-4 Andreas Seppi #71 Match data
May 10, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andreas Seppi #42 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Vasek Pospisil #46 Match data
Jan 14, 2015* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Vasek Pospisil #55 6-3 7-6(4) Andreas Seppi #43 Match data
Aug 8, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Vasek Pospisil #104 4-6 6-4 7-6(6) Andreas Seppi #26 Match data
Oct 27, 2011* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Andreas Seppi #52 7-5 7-6(4) Vasek Pospisil #133 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Vasek Pospisil #1,265 #25 1,359 1,958 122 161 43.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Seppi Vasek Pospisil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0
21 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0 2011 3–4 42.9% #119 1,668 0 0
22 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0 2012 4–12 25.0% #125 1,607 0 0
23 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0 2013 17–15 53.1% #32 1,798 0 0
24 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0 2014 20–24 45.5% #53 1,808 0 0
25 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0 2015 24–22 52.2% #39 1,869 0 0
26 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0 2016 9–21 30.0% #133 1,749 0 0
27 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1 2017 6–13 31.6% #108 1,697 0 0
28 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3 2018 8–14 36.4% #70 1,757 0 0
29 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3 2019 3–5 37.5% #149 1,810 0 0
30 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3 2020 16–10 61.5% #61 1,926 0 0
31 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3 2021 8–14 36.4% #133 1,761 0 0
32 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3 2022 4–3 57.1% #98 1,715 0 0
33 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3 2023 0–2 0.0% #437 1,648 0 0
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3 2024 0–1 0.0% #733 1,626 0 0
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3 2025 0–1 0.0% #1265 1,610 0 0
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3