H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andreas Vinciguerra vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-3
Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Andreas Vinciguerra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2002 Washington second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 45
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-3 | Andreas Vinciguerra | Match data |
| May 16, 2001* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 7-5 6-3 | Andreas Vinciguerra | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2001* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andreas Vinciguerra | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1998* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 7-5 | Andreas Vinciguerra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Vinciguerra | #1,830 | #33 | 1,065 | 1,825 | 82 | 88 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Vinciguerra | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #633 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #98 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #52 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #237 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #565 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |