H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Andreas Vinciguerra vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–1 lead over Andreas Vinciguerra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2002 Washington Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andreas Vinciguerra
SWE Age 45 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #125 6-4 6-3 Andreas Vinciguerra #100 Match data Aug 14, 2002* R64 Washington Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Cedric Pioline #43 7-5 6-3 Andreas Vinciguerra #34 Match data May 16, 2001* R64 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Andreas Vinciguerra #38 4-6 6-4 6-4 Cedric Pioline #19 Match data Feb 22, 2001* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 7-5 Andreas Vinciguerra #647 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andreas Vinciguerra #1,842 #33 1,065 1,831 83 89 48.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andreas Vinciguerra Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1998 0–2 0.0% #633 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1999 9–6 60.0% #98 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 27–21 56.2% #52 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 29–27 51.8% #34 1,721 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 2002 3–12 20.0% #180 1,596 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 2003 9–11 45.0% #121 1,613 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 2005 1–1 50.0% #408 1,617 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 2006 1–3 25.0% #146 1,574 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2009 3–2 60.0% #237 1,601 0 1 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2010 1–2 33.3% #565 1,629 0 1 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2011 0–1 0.0% #727 1,607 0 1 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2013 0–1 0.0% #766 1,581 0 1 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andreas Vinciguerra Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 17 13 30 56.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 48 46 94 51.1% 28 34 62 45.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 153/172 of Andreas Vinciguerra's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andreas Vinciguerra Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1998 2/2 4.5 3.0 64.7% 59.9% 44.5% 55.0% 50.0% 54.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 13/15 2.8 3.2 60.8% 71.4% 51.0% 59.1% 44.0% 63.2% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 35/48 5.0 3.1 55.6% 71.5% 50.5% 64.6% 43.8% 62.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 53/56 4.5 2.9 57.3% 69.3% 48.5% 62.2% 44.4% 60.5% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 14/15 3.6 1.7 62.1% 66.2% 52.5% 50.6% 35.1% 60.5% 30.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 20/20 4.7 3.0 62.4% 71.4% 51.0% 63.6% 39.2% 63.6% 33.7% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 2005 2/2 5.5 1.5 56.1% 71.5% 59.6% 76.9% 66.1% 66.8% 46.8% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 2006 4/4 3.3 2.3 65.6% 61.2% 47.6% 49.3% 47.6% 56.5% 37.0% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2009 5/5 5.2 2.0 68.6% 71.3% 52.2% 69.7% 47.6% 65.5% 33.3% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2010 3/3 9.0 3.7 61.1% 73.5% 52.5% 53.4% 39.3% 65.5% 29.8% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2011 1/1 1.0 2.0 74.4% 63.9% 33.3% 60.0% 60.0% 56.1% 37.7% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 2013 1/1 3.0 3.0 50.0% 73.0% 56.8% 50.0% — 64.9% 18.3% 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 153/172 4.5 2.8 59.1% 69.8% 50.1% 61.3% 42.9% 61.6% 37.1% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andreas Vinciguerra Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1998 1477 103.2 -1.09 +0.14 0.859 47.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 1604 125.0 +1.29 +2.07 1.170 52.2% -5 -24 — 56.3% +0.34 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.0 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1724 148.6 -0.04 +2.26 1.048 50.9% +10 -22 -143 54.7% +0.53 6–6 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 100.9 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1721 137.1 -1.09 -0.46 0.950 49.2% +67 -64 -193 48.2% -0.20 10–2 (83%) 13–12 (52%) 107.4 +1.47 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 2002 1596 115.2 -0.45 -4.46 0.766 45.6% +93 -12 — 21.2% -1.52 — 3–4 (43%) — -0.10 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 2003 1613 125.1 +0.82 -2.65 0.925 49.0% +77 -4 — 44.4% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–5 (38%) 96.9 +0.28 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 2005 1617 107.3 +0.63 +0.93 1.408 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 2006 1574 107.7 -1.76 -0.23 0.851 47.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2009 1601 114.0 +1.26 -0.32 0.965 49.0% — +54 — 46.2% -0.31 3–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 103.1 -0.21 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2010 1630 114.4 -0.61 +0.56 0.865 48.4% — — — 44.4% -0.66 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -0.37 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2011 1607 99.9 -1.12 -0.06 0.858 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 2013 1581 99.5 +0.73 -0.03 0.522 44.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.22 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1831 138.4 -0.24 -0.21 0.966 49.5% +45 -28 -168 47.0% -0.13 25–20 (56%) 34–44 (44%) 100.9 +0.65 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.