H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrei Cherkasov vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 2-0
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1992 New Haven second round 4-6 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1992* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1992* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Cherkasov | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |