H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrei Cherkasov vs Eric Jelen H2H: 2-0
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–0 lead over Eric Jelen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1991 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1991* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-0 6-2 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
| May 19, 1990* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-2 6-0 | Eric Jelen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Eric Jelen | #1,153 | #23 | 575 | 1,805 | 124 | 127 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Cherkasov | Eric Jelen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #31 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #40 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #76 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #47 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #118 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |