H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrei Cherkasov vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-0
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1990 Moscow fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1990* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-3 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Cherkasov | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |