H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andrei Cherkasov vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 2-0
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–0 lead over Jacco Eltingh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1994 Miami Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1993* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-1 7-6(6) | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Cherkasov | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |