H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Andrei Cherkasov vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 1-0
Andrei Cherkasov holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics quarterfinal 6-1 6-4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | QF | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-1 6-4 6-7(3) 4-6 6-2 | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 175 | 200 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,809 | 64 | 87 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Cherkasov | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,439 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,482 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,438 | 0 | 2 |