H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Cherkasov vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 0-1

Jimmy Connors holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Cherkasov

RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main draw meetings

Jimmy Connors

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Jun 28, 1989*	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	R128	Grass	Jimmy Connors #13	6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3	Andrei Cherkasov #61	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Andrei Cherkasov	#1,174	#13	1,320	1,897	170	198	46.2%	0	0	0	0	2	2
Jimmy Connors	#1,295	#1	875	2,410	1,262	294	81.1%	8	1	1	0	99	109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Andrei Cherkasov							Jimmy Connors
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,480	0	0
17	1988	0–1	0.0%	#236	1,497	0	0	1970	5–4	55.6%	—	1,557	0	0
18	1989	13–16	44.8%	#82	1,572	0	0	1971	23–13	63.9%	—	1,769	0	0
19	1990	35–26	57.4%	#21	1,877	0	1	1972	76–25	75.2%	—	1,991	0	6
20	1991	37–29	56.1%	#21	1,815	0	2	1973	86–16	84.3%	#3	2,152	0	17
21	1992	29–29	50.0%	#32	1,711	0	2	1974	95–6	94.1%	#1	2,301	3	32
22	1993	34–31	52.3%	#37	1,753	0	2	1975	79–10	88.8%	#1	2,260	3	41
23	1994	8–27	22.9%	#172	1,554	0	2	1976	97–8	92.4%	#1	2,370	4	53
24	1995	2–5	28.6%	#184	1,535	0	2	1977	69–15	82.1%	#1	2,271	4	61
25	1996	3–12	20.0%	#133	1,463	0	2	1978	67–6	91.8%	#1	2,326	5	71
26	1997	5–10	33.3%	#164	1,485	0	2	1979	78–12	86.7%	#2	2,272	5	79
27	1998	0–3	0.0%	#164	1,462	0	2	1980	73–15	83.0%	#3	2,197	5	85
28	1999	3–6	33.3%	#217	1,483	0	2	1981	59–12	83.1%	#2	2,162	5	89
29	2000	1–3	25.0%	#198	1,452	0	2	1982	78–11	87.6%	#2	2,263	7	96
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1983	52–11	82.5%	#3	2,193	8	100
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	69–12	85.2%	#2	2,240	8	105
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	45–15	75.0%	#4	2,133	8	105
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	46–15	75.4%	#8	2,013	8	105
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	52–19	73.2%	#4	1,985	8	105
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	40–11	78.4%	#7	2,020	8	107
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	31–13	70.5%	#14	1,957	8	109
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	0–3	0.0%	#936	1,881	8	109
38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	19–14	57.6%	#49	1,887	8	109
39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	17–16	51.5%	#84	1,774	8	109
40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	3–5	37.5%	#370	1,717	8	109
41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1–3	25.0%	#672	1,681	8	109
42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	2–2	50.0%	#419	1,673	8	109
43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1996	0–1	0.0%	#1300	1,665	8	109