H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Andrei Cherkasov vs Libor Nemecek H2H: 1-1

Andrei Cherkasov and Libor Nemecek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Libor Nemecek leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Libor Nemecek won the 1989 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 32 6-1 7-6.

RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
CZE Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Libor Nemecek #243 6-1 7-6 Andrei Cherkasov #67 Match data Aug 3, 1989* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay
Andrei Cherkasov #223 6-1 6-3 Libor Nemecek #333 Match data Jan 14, 1989* QF Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Libor Nemecek #869 #164 212 1,562 11 20 35.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Libor Nemecek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2 1989 4–3 57.1% #295 1,543 0 0
21 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2 1990 0–2 0.0% #255 1,519 0 0
22 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2 1991 1–1 50.0% #210 1,525 0 0
23 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2 1992 2–3 40.0% #173 1,536 0 0
24 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2 1993 2–3 40.0% #227 1,539 0 0
25 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2 1994 1–4 20.0% #329 1,531 0 0
26 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #326 1,533 0 0
27 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2 1997 0–1 0.0% #434 1,526 0 0
29 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #855 1,509 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Libor Nemecek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 3 9 12 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's and 19/22 of Libor Nemecek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Libor Nemecek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1% —/—
21 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9% —/—
22 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9% 1991 2/2 0.0 1.0 71.7% 51.3% 54.8% 44.3% 43.6% 51.2% 49.4%
23 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4% 1992 4/5 0.0 1.0 89.6% 58.9% 62.5% 61.6% 53.7% 59.0% 45.1%
24 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6% 1993 4/5 0.8 0.8 85.0% 60.1% 54.6% 73.5% 27.0% 58.9% 37.5%
25 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9% 1994 4/5 0.8 1.3 80.9% 58.4% 53.3% 41.3% 28.1% 57.2% 35.7%
26 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4% 1995 3/3 0.0 1.0 88.1% 57.0% 23.3% 37.3% 43.8% 53.2% 32.1%
27 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1% —/—
28 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7% 1997 1/1 0.0 4.0 78.9% 48.2% 26.7% 22.2% 50.0% 43.7% 46.9%
29 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4% 1998 1/1 0.0 5.0 61.7% 48.3% 38.9% 50.0% 16.7% 44.7% 36.8%
Career 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2% 19/31 0.3 1.4 82.7% 56.8% 48.8% 51.5% 37.9% 55.3% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Libor Nemecek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1510 122.7 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 -0.18
18 1989 1578 139.4 +40 -28 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) -0.78
19 1990 1880 155.5 -6 -147 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) -2.83
20 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) -1.80 1989 1544 108.2 +4 +8 52.9% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.44
21 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) -2.86 1990 1520 102.7 16.7% -1.83 1–2 (33%) +0.02
22 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) -1.60 1991 1526 105.8 +0.26 -0.42 1.013 50.7% 50.0% +0.25 +0.17
23 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) -2.62 1992 1537 113.6 -0.82 +1.20 1.102 52.4% +6 45.5% 0.00 0–1 1–0 -0.04
24 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% +65 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.10 1993 1539 111.1 -1.60 +2.59 0.913 48.6% +9 40.0% 0.00 0–1 +0.34
25 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) +0.66 1994 1531 119.6 +0.24 +0.96 0.835 46.7% +12 27.3% -1.36 0–1 1–0 -0.42
26 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) +0.31 1995 1533 104.6 -1.80 -3.27 0.687 43.0% 33.3% -1.83 -0.11
27 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% 14.3% -1.57 0–1 -0.13
28 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 +0.30 1997 1526 105.0 +1.95 -0.63 0.832 45.2% 0.0% -2.50 -0.16
29 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 25.0% -0.88 0–1 +0.05 1998 1509 95.7 -0.47 -1.08 0.666 40.4% 0.0% -4.00 +0.17
30 2001 1437 97.2
Career 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03 1562 119.0 -0.64 +0.35 0.886 47.7% +7 +8 37.7% -0.66 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 100.7 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.