H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Cherkasov vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-2

Andrei Cherkasov and Mark Woodforde are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1996 Adelaide third round 6-3 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 1996* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #51 6-3 5-7 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #184 Match data
Jan 19, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #40 6-1 2-6 6-1 7-5 Mark Woodforde #28 Match data
Oct 27, 1993* Stockholm Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Andrei Cherkasov #40 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Mark Woodforde #25 Match data
Jan 6, 1989* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Woodforde #42 6-3 7-6 Andrei Cherkasov #236 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4