H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Andrei Cherkasov vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 2-1

Andrei Cherkasov holds a 2–1 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1993 Moscow round of 16 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Patrik Kuhnen
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patrik Kuhnen #170 6-3 1-6 6-3 Andrei Cherkasov #36 Match data Nov 12, 1993* R16 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Andrei Cherkasov #21 6-7(7) 7-5 6-0 6-1 Patrik Kuhnen #98 Match data Jan 15, 1992* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrei Cherkasov #17 5-7 6-2 7-6 Patrik Kuhnen #71 Match data Feb 21, 1991* R32 Stuttgart Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Patrik Kuhnen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0
21 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0
22 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0
23 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0
24 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0
25 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0
26 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0
27 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0
29 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Patrik Kuhnen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6% — 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's and 129/147 of Patrik Kuhnen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9% 1991 40/45 5.4 4.0 55.4% 73.2% 47.9% 53.4% 49.0% 62.0% 38.5%
26 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4% 1992 31/39 8.0 4.6 57.5% 73.9% 44.8% 64.3% 38.9% 61.3% 35.2%
27 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1% 1993 33/35 6.0 3.7 52.8% 73.8% 47.3% 52.7% 43.7% 61.4% 35.1%
28 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7% 1994 12/14 5.4 3.6 59.2% 70.9% 49.8% 61.1% 26.8% 62.0% 36.9%
29 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4% 1995 11/11 8.3 3.7 55.3% 74.1% 44.2% 51.9% 42.6% 60.9% 31.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 12.5 6.0 58.1% 84.3% 44.1% 81.7% 50.0% 67.0% 27.1%
Career — 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2% — 129/277 6.5 4.0 55.6% 73.6% 46.8% 56.9% 42.6% 61.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 100.0 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) 96.0 -1.80 1986 1508 110.1 — — — — +42 — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.37
21 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) 96.3 -2.86 1987 1583 123.1 — — — — +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.3 +0.03
22 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) 102.9 -1.60 1988 1701 124.9 — — — — -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.7 +1.00
23 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 -2.62 1989 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.7 -0.67
24 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10 1990 1675 136.1 — — — — +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) 104.8 -0.51
25 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 97.5 +0.66 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 +0.13
26 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +0.31 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 — +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 99.0 -0.13
27 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13 1993 1632 125.3 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 98.6 +0.06
28 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 — — 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 +0.57
29 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 — — 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.15
30 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% — — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
Career — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03 — 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.