H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andrei Cherkasov vs Udo Riglewski H2H: 1-0

Andrei Cherkasov holds a 1–0 lead over Udo Riglewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1990 Moscow semifinal 6-1 7-6.

RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Cherkasov #32 6-1 7-6 Udo Riglewski #105 Match data Nov 10, 1990* SF Moscow ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Udo Riglewski #1,274 #82 394 1,657 43 79 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Udo Riglewski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0 1985 2–2 50.0% #204 1,537 0 0
19 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1 1986 1–2 33.3% #371 1,531 0 0
20 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% #338 1,533 0 0
21 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2 1988 4–10 28.6% #93 1,502 0 0
22 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2 1989 9–16 36.0% #142 1,532 0 0
23 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2 1990 15–23 39.5% #88 1,611 0 0
24 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2 1991 10–20 33.3% #170 1,586 0 0
25 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2 1992 1–2 33.3% #369 1,589 0 0
26 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2 1993 0–1 0.0% #578 1,578 0 0
27 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #1153 1,561 0 0
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Udo Riglewski
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1987 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6% 10 25 35 28.6% 18 39 57 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's and 34/35 of Udo Riglewski's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Udo Riglewski
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1% —/—
21 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9% —/—
22 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9% —/—
23 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4% —/—
24 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6% 1991 29/30 3.5 2.0 61.2% 67.4% 46.1% 56.6% 39.7% 58.9% 35.8%
25 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9% 1992 3/3 2.0 3.7 48.2% 68.8% 36.7% 49.2% 61.4% 51.5% 39.4%
26 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4% 1993 1/1 7.0 9.0 58.0% 65.5% 45.2% 44.4% 14.3% 57.0% 36.4%
27 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1% 1994 1/1 4.0 2.0 55.9% 55.3% 33.3% 40.0% 50.0% 45.6% 39.0%
28 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7% —/—
29 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4% —/—
Career 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2% 34/122 3.5 2.4 59.8% 67.1% 44.9% 55.1% 41.2% 57.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Cherkasov Udo Riglewski
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1510 122.7 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 -0.18
18 1989 1578 139.4 +40 -28 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 100.0 -0.78 1985 1537 116.0 +28 50.0% +0.50 0–1 -0.32
19 1990 1880 155.5 -6 -147 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 -2.83 1986 1532 106.1 50.0% -0.12 0–2 1–2 (33%) +0.19
20 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) 96.0 -1.80 1987 1534 108.4 +28 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 -0.15
21 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) 96.3 -2.86 1988 1502 110.6 +1 +31 40.0% -0.92 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 97.7 +0.39
22 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) 102.9 -1.60 1989 1533 131.1 +10 -9 39.7% -0.53 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 103.9 +0.10
23 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 -2.62 1990 1612 128.6 +22 -69 43.6% -0.65 7–7 (50%) 10–7 (59%) 105.4 +0.06
24 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% +65 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.10 1991 1586 127.0 -1.02 -2.59 0.872 47.3% +35 -53 35.2% -1.06 3–4 (43%) 5–10 (33%) 96.7 -2.04
25 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 97.5 +0.66 1992 1589 110.7 -1.97 -1.31 0.813 45.5% 33.3% -1.67 1–0 -0.28
26 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +0.31 1993 1579 104.4 +1.76 +0.80 0.847 45.4% 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 -0.07
27 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% 14.3% -1.57 0–1 -0.13 1994 1562 99.1 +1.49 -2.59 0.716 42.5% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.09
28 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 +0.30
29 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 25.0% -0.88 0–1 +0.05
30 2001 1437 97.2
Career 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03 1657 130.6 -0.95 -2.38 0.859 47.0% +22 -27 40.1% -0.75 18–27 (40%) 25–27 (48%) 100.0 -1.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.