H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-1

Andrei Chesnokov and Albert Portas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1998 Prague round of 16 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Albert Portas
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #1346 6-4 6-0 Albert Portas #62 Match data May 1, 1998* R16 Prague ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Portas #200 6-3 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data Apr 26, 1995* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Albert Portas #1,082 #19 1,350 1,826 142 198 41.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Albert Portas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1995 4–3 57.1% #119 1,549 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1996 0–4 0.0% #182 1,505 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1997 22–17 56.4% #35 1,623 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1998 13–24 35.1% #84 1,592 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1999 14–18 43.8% #90 1,598 0 0
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 2000 22–23 48.9% #51 1,633 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 2001 32–28 53.3% #20 1,684 0 1
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 2002 9–23 28.1% #88 1,525 0 1
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 2003 10–20 33.3% #85 1,523 0 1
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 2004 4–16 20.0% #175 1,443 0 1
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 2005 2–6 25.0% #119 1,437 0 1
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 2006 8–12 40.0% #140 1,522 0 1
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 2007 2–3 40.0% #338 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Albert Portas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1995 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 2 2 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 18 15 33 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 29 15 44 65.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 0 2 2 0.0% 4 14 18 22.2% — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 11 38 49 22.4% 127 141 268 47.4% 3 11 14 21.4% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 302/340 of Albert Portas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Albert Portas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 1/1 1.0 2.0 54.9% 53.8% 37.5% 58.3% 0.0% 46.5% 23.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 7/7 1.0 2.4 62.3% 63.3% 50.9% 65.0% 38.1% 57.6% 41.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/4 2.5 3.3 61.6% 58.5% 40.2% 42.1% 45.4% 51.6% 32.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 35/39 2.8 2.7 66.9% 63.8% 50.3% 51.5% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 30/37 3.7 3.7 56.2% 64.0% 44.6% 49.1% 40.8% 55.7% 36.9%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% 1999 25/32 3.4 3.7 60.1% 66.5% 49.1% 52.6% 45.9% 59.3% 40.4%
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 2000 40/45 4.9 3.9 52.9% 72.2% 48.0% 54.6% 44.5% 60.6% 40.3%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 2001 50/60 5.4 4.0 51.9% 73.6% 49.3% 51.8% 45.5% 61.7% 41.8%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 2002 29/32 4.6 4.4 57.8% 68.5% 46.4% 61.3% 35.1% 59.1% 34.2%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 2003 30/30 4.3 3.8 57.3% 67.2% 44.2% 53.2% 40.1% 57.3% 34.5%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% 2004 20/20 3.3 3.8 58.9% 67.0% 44.5% 54.6% 41.8% 57.4% 33.7%
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% 2005 8/8 5.3 4.0 56.2% 68.5% 49.4% 60.2% 35.4% 59.4% 41.0%
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% 2006 20/20 5.0 3.3 52.4% 70.8% 43.7% 58.1% 38.4% 57.9% 35.0%
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% 2007 3/5 4.0 2.0 53.1% 65.1% 44.6% 29.2% 68.5% 56.9% 36.2%
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 302/340 4.2 3.7 57.0% 68.3% 47.1% 53.8% 42.4% 58.8% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Albert Portas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1993 1489 97.9 -0.36 -2.93 0.431 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1995 1549 117.3 -1.11 +0.50 0.977 49.8% — +36 — 52.9% +0.29 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.19
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1996 1505 104.2 -1.11 -1.99 0.660 41.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1997 1624 137.9 -1.24 +2.07 1.015 50.4% -145 +129 — 53.1% +0.18 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.28
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 1998 1593 127.8 -4.13 -1.13 0.833 46.5% -75 +77 — 39.1% -1.10 5–8 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 -0.52
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 1999 1599 127.3 -1.18 +0.60 0.992 50.1% -115 +97 — 44.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 97.3 +0.15
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 2000 1634 133.9 -1.01 +1.75 1.021 50.4% -170 +97 -55 49.1% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -0.53
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 2001 1684 138.5 +0.01 +2.56 1.089 51.3% -206 +145 — 53.9% +0.33 9–15 (38%) 13–11 (54%) 98.7 -0.03
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 2002 1526 118.0 -2.52 -3.44 0.838 47.1% -52 +128 — 34.6% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.8 +2.18
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 2003 1523 121.5 -3.46 -2.15 0.808 46.4% -58 +89 — 32.9% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) 97.1 +0.03
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 2004 1444 107.2 -4.07 -3.59 0.791 45.9% — +62 — 26.1% -1.35 0–3 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 94.2 +1.14
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 2005 1438 117.9 -0.16 +0.12 1.010 50.3% — +45 — 33.3% -0.56 0–2 0–2 — -0.17
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 2006 1522 120.5 -1.93 -2.12 0.831 46.7% — +46 — 37.5% -0.98 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 107.3 -0.98
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 2007 1548 107.4 -0.42 -2.10 0.839 46.7% — +48 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — +0.30
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1826 132.5 -1.82 -0.13 0.929 48.7% -125 +97 -55 43.3% -0.48 43–57 (43%) 49–58 (46%) 96.9 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.