H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-1
Andrei Chesnokov and Albert Portas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1998 Prague fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1998* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-0 | Albert Portas | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1995* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-3 6-1 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |