H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 0-1
Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1994 Stuttgart Outdoor semifinal 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |