H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Brad Gilbert H2H: 2-1
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Brad Gilbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Memphis fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1993* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1992* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-1 2-6 7-6(3) | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1990* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Brad Gilbert | 6-3 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Brad Gilbert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 |