H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 2-2

Andrei Chesnokov and Carl Uwe Steeb are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1992 Miami Masters second round 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1992* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Carl Uwe Steeb #44 4-6 6-2 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #19 Match data
Jun 4, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #27 3-6 6-1 7-5 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #34 Match data
Apr 27, 1989* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R32 Clay Carl Uwe Steeb #57 6-4 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #28 Match data
Jan 20, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #35 6-1 6-4 6-2 Carl Uwe Steeb #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,920 189 190 49.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Carl Uwe Steeb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,615 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1988 19–18 51.4% #73 1,680 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,857 0 1
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,711 0 1
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,745 0 2
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1992 31–24 56.4% #29 1,787 0 2
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,718 0 2
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,607 0 2
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,660 0 3
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —