H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 19:16 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Carlos Moya H2H: 1-0
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 1–0 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1996 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1996* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-3 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Carlos Moya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 |