H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1996 New Haven round of 64 1-6 7-6(8) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #84 1-6 7-6(8) 6-2 Cecil Mamiit #355 Match data Aug 14, 1996* R64 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Cecil Mamiit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Cecil Mamiit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Cecil Mamiit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4%
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8%
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Cecil Mamiit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.