H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Sydney Outdoor third round 6-1 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 1994* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #27 6-1 5-7 6-4 Cedric Pioline #10 Match data
Oct 9, 1993* Toulouse ATP 250 SF Hard Cedric Pioline #12 6-4 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #28 Match data
May 13, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #33 6-7(4) 6-3 6-0 Cedric Pioline #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5