H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Cristiano Caratti H2H: 2-0
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–0 lead over Cristiano Caratti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1996 Bologna third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1996* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-5 6-1 | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1990* | New Haven | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-2 6-1 | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Cristiano Caratti | #836 | #26 | 932 | 1,806 | 71 | 115 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Cristiano Caratti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #160 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #129 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #82 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #156 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #138 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #135 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |