H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs David Rikl H2H: 2-2

Andrei Chesnokov and David Rikl are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Rikl leads 2–1 on clay, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 6-1 2-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Rikl #51 6-1 2-1 (ret.) Andrei Chesnokov #38 Match data
Apr 30, 1994* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #26 6-3 7-6(1) David Rikl #46 Match data
Apr 21, 1994* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay David Rikl #62 7-6(2) 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #26 Match data
Mar 2, 1994* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #27 6-2 6-1 David Rikl #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,685 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,530 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,534 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,533 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,565 0 0
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —