H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 2-2

Andrei Chesnokov and Fabrice Santoro are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 2–0 on clay, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Toulouse fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 1994* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #41 2-6 6-3 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #52 Match data
Oct 7, 1993* Toulouse ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #28 6-2 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #60 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Nice ATP 250 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #54 6-3 0-6 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #29 Match data
Apr 20, 1990* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay Fabrice Santoro #126 6-3 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6