H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 2-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Libéma Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #130 6-4 7-6(6) Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data Jun 11, 1992* R32 Libéma Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Andrei Chesnokov #33 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Gilad Bloom #123 Match data Jan 17, 1992* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #12 6-3 6-3 Gilad Bloom #72 Match data Oct 13, 1990* SF Tel Aviv ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Gilad Bloom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Gilad Bloom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 68/80 of Gilad Bloom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Gilad Bloom
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 34/39 2.1 2.3 62.5% 66.8% 48.2% 55.3% 43.3% 59.7% 38.2%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% 1992 24/29 2.3 3.0 64.5% 64.6% 49.2% 56.2% 42.2% 59.1% 38.2%
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1993 5/6 2.0 3.4 66.2% 67.9% 46.4% 57.3% 53.1% 60.5% 39.2%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1994 4/5 3.0 1.5 60.9% 62.6% 47.4% 46.3% 43.1% 56.5% 41.9%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1995 1/1 0.0 1.0 46.3% 60.0% 34.5% 50.0% 40.0% 46.3% 40.0%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 68/188 2.2 2.5 63.1% 65.8% 48.2% 55.1% 43.6% 59.1% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Gilad Bloom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.