H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 2-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1992 Rosmalen third round 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1992* Rosmalen ATP 250 R32 Grass Gilad Bloom #130 6-4 7-6(6) Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data
Jan 17, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #33 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Gilad Bloom #123 Match data
Oct 13, 1990* Tel Aviv ATP 250 SF Hard Andrei Chesnokov #12 6-3 6-3 Gilad Bloom #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,750 82 103 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Gilad Bloom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,547 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1988 6–11 35.3% #210 1,562 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,577 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,735 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,634 0 0
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1992 13–14 48.1% #137 1,656 0 0
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,630 0 0
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,618 0 0
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,608 0 0
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —