H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 1-2
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1996 US Open first round 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 1-6 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1989* | Nice | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 6-7 7-6 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1989* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |