H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 3-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 3–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Hamburg Masters quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Horacio de la Pena
ARG Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 1993* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #74 6-2 6-0 Horacio de la Pena #94 Match data
Apr 4, 1991* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #14 6-4 6-2 Horacio de la Pena #65 Match data
Mar 9, 1989* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #19 6-4 6-4 Horacio de la Pena #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,832 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Horacio de la Pena
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,733 0 1
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,642 0 1
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,735 0 1
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,720 0 3
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,552 0 3
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,595 0 4
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —