H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 3-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 3–0 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Hamburg Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov

RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H

3 – 0

3 main-draw meetings

Horacio de la Pena

ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Andrei Chesnokov #74	6-2 6-0	Horacio de la Pena #94	Match data	May 9, 1993*	QF	Hamburg Open	Masters 1000	Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #14	6-4 6-2	Horacio de la Pena #65	Match data	Apr 4, 1991*	R32	Estoril Open	ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250	Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #19	6-4 6-4	Horacio de la Pena #51	Match data	Mar 9, 1989*	R32	Scottsdale	ATP 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Andrei Chesnokov	#709	#9	1,399	1,971	317	237	57.2%	0	2	0	0	5	7
Horacio de la Pena	#846	#31	679	1,833	185	173	51.7%	0	0	0	0	4	4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Andrei Chesnokov							Horacio de la Pena
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	4–4	50.0%	#89	1,548	0	0
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	23–17	57.5%	#70	1,689	0	1
19	1985	3–3	50.0%	#137	1,547	0	0	1986	33–21	61.1%	#38	1,734	0	1
20	1986	13–9	59.1%	#36	1,733	0	0	1987	17–19	47.2%	#88	1,643	0	1
21	1987	24–16	60.0%	#52	1,795	0	1	1988	27–17	61.4%	#52	1,737	0	1
22	1988	44–17	72.1%	#14	1,870	0	2	1989	15–17	46.9%	#128	1,651	0	2
23	1989	30–16	65.2%	#22	1,864	0	4	1990	20–14	58.8%	#63	1,724	0	3
24	1990	43–20	68.3%	#12	1,878	0	6	1991	16–18	47.1%	#101	1,721	0	3
25	1991	28–21	57.1%	#31	1,784	0	7	1992	7–18	28.0%	#114	1,551	0	3
26	1992	29–28	50.9%	#30	1,730	0	7	1993	17–16	51.5%	#79	1,594	0	4
27	1993	37–28	56.9%	#27	1,750	0	7	1994	6–12	33.3%	#265	1,555	0	4
28	1994	37–29	56.1%	#32	1,772	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1995	14–22	38.9%	#89	1,629	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1996	11–20	35.5%	#85	1,585	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1997	2–4	33.3%	#209	1,572	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1998	2–3	40.0%	#494	1,566	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1999	0–1	0.0%	#872	1,552	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Andrei Chesnokov																	Horacio de la Pena
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	—	—	—	—	4	4	8	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	5	3	8	62.5%	18	14	32	56.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1985	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1986	4	4	8	50.0%	29	16	45	64.4%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
20	1986	5	3	8	62.5%	6	2	8	75.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	1987	0	5	5	0.0%	17	14	31	54.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1987	6	5	11	54.5%	16	6	22	72.7%	—	—	—	—	2	5	7	28.6%	1988	10	7	17	58.8%	17	8	25	68.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
22	1988	24	7	31	77.4%	10	4	14	71.4%	4	2	6	66.7%	6	4	10	60.0%	1989	4	7	11	36.4%	9	7	16	56.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%
23	1989	11	9	20	55.0%	17	4	21	81.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1990	1	4	5	20.0%	19	9	28	67.9%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1990	21	11	32	65.6%	21	6	27	77.8%	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	1991	0	3	3	0.0%	16	14	30	53.3%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
25	1991	11	7	18	61.1%	10	7	17	58.8%	—	—	—	—	7	7	14	50.0%	1992	0	1	1	0.0%	7	16	23	30.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
26	1992	17	13	30	56.7%	7	7	14	50.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	1993	—	—	—	—	17	15	32	53.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
27	1993	13	10	23	56.5%	20	10	30	66.7%	1	3	4	25.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	1994	—	—	—	—	6	12	18	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1994	11	11	22	50.0%	19	13	32	59.4%	—	—	—	—	7	5	12	58.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1995	3	8	11	27.3%	7	9	16	43.8%	0	1	1	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1996	3	9	12	25.0%	7	7	14	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1997	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1998	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1999	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	127	96	223	57.0%	145	80	225	64.4%	6	14	20	30.0%	39	47	86	45.3%	—	24	34	58	41.4%	159	129	288	55.2%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	6	8	25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Andrei Chesnokov																Horacio de la Pena
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	1548	126.7	—	—	—	—	—	+36	—	47.6%	+0.19	2–2 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.10
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	1690	129.7	—	—	—	—	-65	-50	—	53.6%	-0.07	6–5 (55%)	8–3 (73%)	105.5	+1.63
19	1985	1547	121.7	—	—	—	—	—	+51	—	55.0%	+0.20	0–2	0–1	—	+0.06	1986	1734	143.7	—	—	—	—	-95	+41	—	58.3%	+0.71	9–7 (56%)	7–6 (54%)	101.7	-0.16
20	1986	1733	139.9	—	—	—	—	-84	+19	-231	57.1%	+0.44	2–2 (50%)	4–2 (67%)	103.6	-0.26	1987	1643	127.6	—	—	—	—	-87	+98	—	47.2%	-0.36	7–5 (58%)	5–4 (56%)	99.2	-0.41
21	1987	1796	145.6	—	—	—	—	-88	+23	—	57.6%	+0.46	5–4 (56%)	6–3 (67%)	102.4	-0.88	1988	1737	136.6	—	—	—	—	-122	+90	—	56.6%	+0.42	10–5 (67%)	11–6 (65%)	106.5	+1.19
22	1988	1870	145.9	—	—	—	—	+7	+8	-313	64.4%	+0.94	12–2 (86%)	9–8 (53%)	108.9	+0.32	1989	1651	127.5	—	—	—	—	-43	+105	—	48.2%	+0.13	3–4 (43%)	3–7 (30%)	95.1	+0.13
23	1989	1864	147.5	—	—	—	—	-47	+110	—	61.3%	+0.79	7–5 (58%)	6–5 (55%)	99.6	-1.29	1990	1725	133.8	—	—	—	—	-197	+118	—	59.5%	+0.73	4–5 (44%)	7–6 (54%)	98.7	+0.57
24	1990	1878	150.0	—	—	—	—	-51	+149	—	63.6%	+0.75	12–6 (67%)	17–7 (71%)	106.7	+2.31	1991	1722	138.0	—	—	—	—	-245	+79	—	50.7%	+0.16	5–6 (45%)	3–4 (43%)	97.5	-0.62
25	1991	1785	146.6	-0.90	+3.53	1.055	51.0%	-21	+168	—	54.8%	+0.32	10–8 (56%)	3–5 (38%)	97.6	+0.62	1992	1552	118.2	—	—	—	—	—	+61	—	36.5%	-1.29	1–8 (11%)	3–1 (75%)	94.2	-0.09
26	1992	1731	142.0	-2.64	+1.87	0.945	49.0%	+21	+122	-215	52.0%	-0.08	9–13 (41%)	16–11 (59%)	95.7	-1.43	1993	1595	127.5	—	—	—	—	—	+37	—	52.7%	+0.27	4–5 (44%)	4–5 (44%)	98.2	+1.20
27	1993	1751	150.6	-1.34	+3.83	1.032	50.7%	-18	+164	-256	53.5%	+0.25	12–8 (60%)	14–6 (70%)	110.2	-1.46	1994	1556	113.8	—	—	—	—	—	+6	—	41.0%	-0.49	2–4 (33%)	0–3 (0%)	—	+0.33
28	1994	1773	144.3	-2.46	+3.28	1.020	50.4%	-21	+36	—	54.1%	+0.22	15–11 (58%)	15–6 (71%)	108.6	-0.96	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1995	1629	124.4	-2.64	+0.64	0.945	48.7%	+12	+110	—	44.0%	-0.33	4–6 (40%)	6–9 (40%)	93.7	+0.46	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1996	1586	127.1	-5.11	+1.56	0.888	47.6%	-1	+99	—	41.0%	-0.58	4–7 (36%)	3–6 (33%)	94.7	-0.37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1997	1573	106.6	-2.39	-0.42	0.838	46.6%	-10	—	—	42.9%	-0.57	1–1	0–1	—	+0.22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1998	1566	109.5	-2.05	-0.66	0.859	46.8%	—	+108	—	36.4%	-1.45	—	1–0	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1999	1553	97.0	-0.85	+0.87	0.553	38.9%	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1971	149.2	-2.27	+2.59	0.984	49.7%	-20	+96	-265	55.4%	+0.31	93–75 (55%)	100–70 (59%)	106.2	-0.47	—	1833	138.3	—	—	—	—	-105	+55	—	51.7%	+0.12	53–56 (49%)	52–47 (53%)	98.5	+1.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Andrei Chesnokov's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Jim Courier	5	4	9	Oct 22, 1994	H2H
Michael Stich	3	6	9	May 7, 1994	H2H
Henri Leconte	0	8	8	Apr 19, 1991	H2H
Karel Novacek	4	3	7	Apr 13, 1995	H2H
Jaime Yzaga	5	2	7	Apr 14, 1994	H2H

Horacio de la Pena's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Diego Perez	4	3	7	Nov 11, 1993	H2H
Goran Prpic	2	5	7	Jul 21, 1993	H2H
Luiz Mattar	3	3	6	May 19, 1994	H2H
Eduardo Bengoechea	4	2	6	May 2, 1991	H2H
Claudio Mezzadri	4	1	5	Jun 10, 1993	H2H