H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 1-2
Ivan Lendl holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1992 Basel quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1992* | Basel | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-1 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1991* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-3 4-6 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Ivan Lendl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 |