H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 1-2

Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jakob Hlasek #40 6-3 6-2 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #85 Match data
Feb 15, 1996* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Jakob Hlasek #43 6-4 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #87 Match data
Nov 3, 1993* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Andrei Chesnokov #27 7-6(4) 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —