H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-2

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 3–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1998 Prague third round 7-6(4) 6-3.

RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 1998* Prague ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #1346 7-6(4) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #51 Match data
Feb 17, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Andrei Chesnokov #25 6-4 1-6 6-4 Jeff Tarango #94 Match data
Jun 18, 1992* Manchester ATP 250 R32 Grass Jeff Tarango #69 7-6(6) 2-6 7-6(12) Andrei Chesnokov #32 Match data
Feb 20, 1992* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #57 3-6 6-4 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #35 Match data
Sep 3, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #18 6-4 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2