H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Jim Courier H2H: 5-4

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 5–4 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 3–1 on carpet, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1994 Lyon semifinal 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 1994* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Jim Courier #14 6-3 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #44 Match data
Feb 19, 1994* Philadelphia ATP 250 QF Carpet Jim Courier #3 6-3 6-7(10) 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #25 Match data
Nov 5, 1992* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Jim Courier #1 6-3 6-0 Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data
Sep 4, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jim Courier #1 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-1 Andrei Chesnokov #40 Match data
Mar 7, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #36 6-4 7-5 Jim Courier #1 Match data
Oct 25, 1990* Stockholm Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Andrei Chesnokov #12 3-6 6-3 7-5 Jim Courier #21 Match data
May 19, 1990* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #15 4-6 7-6 6-3 Jim Courier #16 Match data
Jun 7, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #27 2-6 3-6 7-6 6-2 7-5 Jim Courier #47 Match data
Nov 25, 1988* Itaparica ATP 250 R16 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #15 1-6 6-0 6-1 Jim Courier #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7