H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 2-1
Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Schenectady third round 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1994* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-4 7-6(3) | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jimmy Arias | 6-0 6-3 4-6 2-6 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| May 16, 1990* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 7-6 6-3 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |