H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 2-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 2–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1994 Schenectady round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #38 6-4 7-6(3) Jimmy Arias #299 Match data Aug 25, 1994* R32 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Arias #76 6-0 6-3 4-6 2-6 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #12 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #15 7-6 6-3 Jimmy Arias #48 Match data May 16, 1990* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jimmy Arias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 277/316 of Andrei Chesnokov's and 63/72 of Jimmy Arias's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jimmy Arias
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 42/49 2.1 2.1 62.3% 63.5% 52.4% 45.5% 53.1% 59.0% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 50/57 3.0 3.3 54.7% 65.5% 47.0% 53.2% 42.8% 57.4% 40.2% 1991 39/42 1.8 2.8 69.8% 62.0% 49.5% 56.5% 42.3% 58.2% 41.0%
27 1993 61/65 2.9 2.6 55.6% 66.2% 50.4% 49.9% 44.3% 59.1% 42.2% 1992 8/12 2.1 2.4 70.1% 61.2% 48.1% 53.6% 48.5% 57.0% 35.3%
28 1994 57/66 2.9 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 47.6% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 42.1% 1993 9/9 1.4 3.6 69.5% 66.8% 47.3% 51.6% 38.0% 60.7% 38.2%
29 1995 29/36 3.3 2.8 61.0% 65.8% 49.1% 53.9% 36.0% 59.1% 38.6% 1994 5/7 2.6 2.6 62.9% 65.2% 48.9% 58.4% 41.0% 58.4% 34.6%
30 1996 27/31 2.7 2.9 56.8% 62.0% 45.7% 49.9% 44.7% 54.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 6/6 3.8 2.7 56.3% 63.0% 44.3% 62.0% 63.2% 54.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 4/5 1.3 3.8 59.0% 59.5% 40.9% 54.3% 49.3% 52.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1/1 2.0 3.0 57.4% 51.9% 50.0% 42.9% 0.0% 51.1% 27.1% 1998 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.3% 61.1% 46.7% 55.0% 50.0% 55.4% 32.1%
Career — 277/554 2.8 2.7 57.9% 64.9% 48.6% 51.4% 45.5% 58.1% 41.3% — 63/498 1.8 2.9 68.9% 62.8% 48.9% 55.6% 42.6% 58.3% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Jimmy Arias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.26 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.88 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.32 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.29 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) — +2.31 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.62 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.43 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.46 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.96 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.46 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.