H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 0-4

Jimmy Connors holds a 4–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1989 Toulouse semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov

RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H

0 – 4

4 main draw meetings

Jimmy Connors

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Oct 14, 1989*	Toulouse	ATP 250	SF	Hard	Jimmy Connors #14	3-6 6-3 6-1	Andrei Chesnokov #21	Match data
Mar 18, 1989*	Indian Wells	Masters 1000	R16	Hard	Jimmy Connors #8	7-5 7-5	Andrei Chesnokov #29	Match data
Oct 16, 1988*	Toulouse	ATP 250	F	Hard	Jimmy Connors #9	6-2 6-0	Andrei Chesnokov #17	Match data
Feb 12, 1987*	Memphis	ATP 250	R32	Hard	Jimmy Connors #8	6-1 6-3	Andrei Chesnokov #38	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Andrei Chesnokov	#709	#9	1,399	1,972	316	235	57.4%	0	2	0	0	5	7
Jimmy Connors	#1,295	#1	875	2,410	1,262	294	81.1%	8	1	1	0	99	109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Andrei Chesnokov							Jimmy Connors
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,480	0	0
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	5–4	55.6%	—	1,557	0	0
18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1971	23–13	63.9%	—	1,769	0	0
19	1985	3–3	50.0%	#137	1,546	0	0	1972	76–25	75.2%	—	1,991	0	6
20	1986	13–9	59.1%	#36	1,733	0	0	1973	86–16	84.3%	#3	2,152	0	17
21	1987	24–16	60.0%	#52	1,802	0	1	1974	95–6	94.1%	#1	2,301	3	32
22	1988	44–16	73.3%	#14	1,884	0	2	1975	79–10	88.8%	#1	2,260	3	41
23	1989	30–16	65.2%	#22	1,863	0	4	1976	97–8	92.4%	#1	2,370	4	53
24	1990	43–20	68.3%	#12	1,861	0	6	1977	69–15	82.1%	#1	2,271	4	61
25	1991	28–21	57.1%	#31	1,781	0	7	1978	67–6	91.8%	#1	2,326	5	71
26	1992	28–27	50.9%	#30	1,726	0	7	1979	78–12	86.7%	#2	2,272	5	79
27	1993	37–28	56.9%	#27	1,749	0	7	1980	73–15	83.0%	#3	2,197	5	85
28	1994	37–29	56.1%	#32	1,773	0	7	1981	59–12	83.1%	#2	2,162	5	89
29	1995	14–22	38.9%	#89	1,628	0	7	1982	78–11	87.6%	#2	2,263	7	96
30	1996	11–20	35.5%	#85	1,585	0	7	1983	52–11	82.5%	#3	2,193	8	100
31	1997	2–4	33.3%	#209	1,571	0	7	1984	69–12	85.2%	#2	2,240	8	105
32	1998	2–3	40.0%	#494	1,565	0	7	1985	45–15	75.0%	#4	2,133	8	105
33	1999	0–1	0.0%	#872	1,551	0	7	1986	46–15	75.4%	#8	2,013	8	105
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	52–19	73.2%	#4	1,985	8	105
35	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	40–11	78.4%	#7	2,020	8	107
36	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	31–13	70.5%	#14	1,957	8	109
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	0–3	0.0%	#936	1,881	8	109
38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	19–14	57.6%	#49	1,887	8	109
39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	17–16	51.5%	#84	1,774	8	109
40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	3–5	37.5%	#370	1,717	8	109
41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1–3	25.0%	#672	1,681	8	109
42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	2–2	50.0%	#419	1,673	8	109
43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1996	0–1	0.0%	#1300	1,665	8	109