H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs John Frawley H2H: 3-1

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 3–1 lead over John Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1989 Nice round of 32 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
John Frawley
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Chesnokov #30 6-0 6-2 John Frawley Match data Apr 20, 1989* R32 Nice ATP 250 Clay
John Frawley 6-1 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #19 Match data Aug 18, 1988* R32 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Andrei Chesnokov #19 6-2 6-4 7-6 John Frawley Match data May 25, 1988* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andrei Chesnokov #29 6-3 6-1 John Frawley Match data Mar 10, 1988* R32 Orlando ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,971 317 237 57.2% 0 2 0 0 5 7
John Frawley — — — 1,834 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov John Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,795 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1988 44–17 72.1% #14 1,870 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,864 0 4 — — — — — — —
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,878 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,784 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 1992 29–28 50.9% #30 1,730 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,750 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,772 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,629 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,566 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,552 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Chesnokov John Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1985 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1988 24 7 31 77.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 24 17 41 58.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 1 10 11 9.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1990 21 11 32 65.6% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 11 7 18 61.1% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 11 22 50.0% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 127 96 223 57.0% 145 80 225 64.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 39 47 86 45.3% — 37 40 77 48.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Chesnokov John Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1498 117.6 — — — — +69 — -4 29.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.57
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1458 107.7 — — — — +83 — -2 34.8% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +0.76
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1654 130.9 — — — — -37 -1 -122 55.6% +0.50 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 +2.33
19 1985 1547 121.7 — — — — — +51 — 55.0% +0.20 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1985 1647 127.7 — — — — -70 +1 -45 46.1% -0.25 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 98.1 +0.15
20 1986 1733 139.9 — — — — -84 +19 -231 57.1% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1796 145.6 — — — — -88 +23 — 57.6% +0.46 5–4 (56%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.88 1987 1702 119.0 — — — — -91 — -89 52.4% +0.24 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.65
22 1988 1870 145.9 — — — — +7 +8 -313 64.4% +0.94 12–2 (86%) 9–8 (53%) 108.9 +0.32 1988 1738 138.5 — — — — -14 — — 51.3% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 9–10 (47%) 100.0 -0.66
23 1989 1864 147.5 — — — — -47 +110 — 61.3% +0.79 7–5 (58%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -1.29 1989 1536 106.2 — — — — -2 +103 — 28.6% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 +0.38
24 1990 1878 150.0 — — — — -51 +149 — 63.6% +0.75 12–6 (67%) 17–7 (71%) 106.7 +2.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1785 146.6 -0.90 +3.53 1.055 51.0% -21 +168 — 54.8% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1731 142.0 -2.64 +1.87 0.945 49.0% +21 +122 -215 52.0% -0.08 9–13 (41%) 16–11 (59%) 95.7 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1751 150.6 -1.34 +3.83 1.032 50.7% -18 +164 -256 53.5% +0.25 12–8 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 110.2 -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1773 144.3 -2.46 +3.28 1.020 50.4% -21 +36 — 54.1% +0.22 15–11 (58%) 15–6 (71%) 108.6 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1629 124.4 -2.64 +0.64 0.945 48.7% +12 +110 — 44.0% -0.33 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 93.7 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1586 127.1 -5.11 +1.56 0.888 47.6% -1 +99 — 41.0% -0.58 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 94.7 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1573 106.6 -2.39 -0.42 0.838 46.6% -10 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1566 109.5 -2.05 -0.66 0.859 46.8% — +108 — 36.4% -1.45 — 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1553 97.0 -0.85 +0.87 0.553 38.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1971 149.2 -2.27 +2.59 0.984 49.7% -20 +96 -265 55.4% +0.31 93–75 (55%) 100–70 (59%) 106.2 -0.47 — 1835 132.6 — — — — -21 +22 -66 46.5% -0.24 17–25 (40%) 27–27 (50%) 95.8 +1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.